AUTOMOTIVE VSOC · POST-QUANTUM DEFENCE
Most SOCs were designed to watch laptops and data centres. Vehicles are a different problem: thousands of ECUs, millions of endpoints, OTA campaigns, V2X exposure, and a regulator who expects a 24-hour breach disclosure. Our Automotive VSOC is engineered for that surface, with every telemetry hop secured by NIST post-quantum cryptography.
RESPONSE
P95 on critical incidents, around the clock
SURFACE
Vehicle endpoints monitored per VSOC region
CRYPTO
Telemetry under PQC-hybrid mTLS
EVIDENCE
Audit-grade artefacts, ISO/SAE 21434 aligned
WHY A GENERIC SOC FAILS HERE
SAFETY-CRITICAL
Quarantining a server costs revenue. Quarantining a brake controller costs lives. VSOC actuation logic must be probabilistically calibrated and engineered to ISO 26262 safety adjacency, not just SOC 2 compliance.
PROTOCOL ZOO
A single connected vehicle speaks half a dozen protocols at half a dozen privilege levels. Detection logic that only understands TCP and HTTP misses the most important signals.
REGULATORY CLOCK
From detection to a regulator-grade incident report in hours, not weeks. Without a workflow built for type-approval evidence, every incident becomes a panic, and every panic becomes a finding.
REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE
Telemetry flows from vehicle edge, through a PQC-protected ingestion gateway, into detection and analysis, out into response actuators. Every hop is signed with ML-DSA and key-exchanged with ML-KEM in hybrid with X25519, so a future quantum break does not retroactively unwind your evidence chain.
DETECTION COVERAGE
Threat models built from real incident data, Auto-ISAC bulletins, OEM PSIRT disclosures, and academic adversarial work. Not pattern-matching on generic SIEM rules.
Frame-level anomaly detection. Identifier spoofing, replay, injection from compromised ECUs.
Signature verification, version reversion attempts, manifest manipulation, mid-flight aborts.
Pseudonym pool exhaustion, Sybil patterns, RSU impersonation, CRL evasion.
Geofence breach, off-pattern DTC events, fleet-wide synchronised behaviour.
Bulk-capture indicators on V2X channels. Identifying who is recording, where, and at what cadence.
Sudden ECU firmware fingerprint changes, indicating upstream compromise or rogue Tier-2 components.
WHY VSOC AND PQC ARE THE SAME PROJECT
Every signed telemetry record, every issued investigation key, every encrypted disclosure to a regulator, sits on top of cryptography that will not survive a quantum computer. A breach captured in 2027 and decrypted in 2034 still discloses everything it would have disclosed if you had handed it over in plaintext.
VSOC and PQC are not two purchases. They are one project. A vehicle security programme that runs detection on classical-only cryptography is preserving evidence for an adversary who will be able to read it later.
We design VSOC and the cryptographic substrate together: PQ-hybrid mTLS at the ingestion gateway, ML-DSA signatures on every record at write-time, ML-KEM key exchange for incident-grade communications, all of it built around cryptographic agility so the algorithm registry can swap forward as standards evolve.
CRYPTOGRAPHIC ENVELOPE
START WITH A 30-MINUTE CALL
Bring your PSIRT, your security architect, and your in-vehicle platform lead. We bring our VSOC architect and our PQC engineer. One call. We decide whether there is a fit, and you walk away with a clearer map of your defensive posture either way.
Book the call